Go Back   Mark II Forum - A Forum for Continental Mark II > Technical Discussion

Technical Discussion Member discussion on specific tech stuff, such as brakes, engine, air conditioning, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-02-2009, 02:16 AM
Don Henschel Don Henschel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rosthern, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by depmike38 View Post
Supposed to be "slipperier" and create less friction like a synthetic I'd imagine. I tried a using it in a Yamaha Venture years ago with a wet clutch and it took three oil changes with conventional oil to get the clutch to work properly again. Under load it would slip in high gear. I've never broken down one of these old Continental engines. Do they have the same type of rod and main bearings as anything else would or did they do something creative?
Same thing and design as many other engines. A lot of the way these older engines were built was carried into the 1980's. One thing that is different is the blocks were a lot deeper where the main bearings are installed and thats why they are refered to as a "Y" block.
__________________
C56K3391
Two-Tone
05/16
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-02-2009, 09:57 AM
Chuck Lutz's Avatar
Chuck Lutz Chuck Lutz is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 698
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Wolk View Post
The Continental engine was hand-picked pieces from the Lincoln parts bin. Nothing special. Thank goodness.
Someone told me that the 368 was originally a truck engine modified for the Mark II.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-02-2009, 09:59 AM
Barry Wolk's Avatar
Barry Wolk Barry Wolk is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,551
Default

It was a truck engine to start with. It had sturdier mains. However, the Y-block was developed for all the cars, not just the Mark II. The Mark II was originally supposed to have a V-12, like the original Continental.
__________________
Barry Wolk
Farmington Hills, MI

C5681126

'56 Mark II convertible'51 Royal Spartanette'56 Chris Craft Continental
'68 Lincoln Continental Limo '77 Town Car '55 356 Porsche Continental cabrio
'69 Mark III convertible,'88 BMW 750iL, '88 BMW 325iX, '97 BMW Z-3, '98 ML-320
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-02-2009, 10:17 AM
Chuck Lutz's Avatar
Chuck Lutz Chuck Lutz is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 698
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Wolk View Post
It was a truck engine to start with. It had sturdier mains. However, the Y-block was developed for all the cars, not just the Mark II. The Mark II was originally supposed to have a V-12, like the original Continental.
V12!! Cool. Makes sense, even with the V8 and the length of the hood you still have room for a small underdeveloped country.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-02-2009, 12:05 PM
Don Henschel Don Henschel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rosthern, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 447
Default

Started out as a 317.5 in 52 to replace the good old 336.7 flatty in the lincolns. A heavier version was used in trucks as an option as well in 52. Usually they install smaller harder valves, and lower the compression a bit for the truck versions(dont want pinging while working hard). Then it became 341 in 55 and then its last years as a 368 (56-57). Were also used in the higher end Mercs as well. As far as I can tell they are the same block, just a different bore and stroke. I know a collector who has a 52 Capri (also a mechanic) and I am sure he said parts interchanged, kind of like the 332, 352, 390 &higher
__________________
C56K3391
Two-Tone
05/16
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-28-2010, 06:05 PM
brobaey brobaey is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Henschel View Post
After reading this I did alot of looking around with alot of varying opinions etc. I have never had problems(so far) but I have always taken a lot of care during assembly and breakin. I use the proper cam assembly lube (moly disulfide cam lube), and of course the proper fast idle speed during the first startup. Don't leave your engine idling and bring it up to the cam manufacturer recomends. 2000 rpm is recomended to insure enough oil is splashing around to lube your new or reground cam. I also prelube my engine before startup so the lube system is primed and ready for the fast idle. Remember this if you are in the process of installing or rebuilding your engine. The majority of this flat tappet cam failure is during breakin. After breakin this problem is greatly reduced. If you are still concerned about the removal of zinc, use a motor oil for Diesel engines has been mentioned a lot as it has higher concentrations of zinc, and alot of Diesels still use flat tappet cams.
Check this out for cam break in YouTube - Camshaft Break In Procedure Video - Engine Building DVD
Hi there, I've been doing a lot of research on zinc additives. Thanks for the link. One question though, haven't they taken a lot of the zinc out of all of the oils so the diesel oils don't have much more zinc than a conventional oil and have more detergents in it. Would it be better to just buy an additive?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-28-2010, 07:03 PM
Shelly Harris's Avatar
Shelly Harris Shelly Harris is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago North Shore
Posts: 734
Default

I happened to stop in at Pep Boys on the way home and while getting other stuff looked at the zinc bottle that Gary posted. It has no zinc.... it's a zinc "substitute". From what I've read elsewhere I think you can drive a Mark II comfortably without it unless you drive long distances at high speed... then it might be worth using.
__________________
Shelly

C56C2292
'56 Continental Mark II
'74 Lincoln Continental Mark IV
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-30-2010, 03:53 PM
Don Henschel Don Henschel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rosthern, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelly Harris View Post
I happened to stop in at Pep Boys on the way home and while getting other stuff looked at the zinc bottle that Gary posted. It has no zinc.... it's a zinc "substitute". From what I've read elsewhere I think you can drive a Mark II comfortably without it unless you drive long distances at high speed... then it might be worth using.
Actually the long distance high speed is alot better than stop and start and idling around. Your cam, valve train etc. get much better lubrication due to more oil splashing around in your engine. Your camshaft is lubricated by oil flying off of the big end of your connecting rod. Some engines have a tiny hole drilled in the rod for more oil spray. This is why you should never leave your engine idling slow during first time startup when you install a new camshaft.
__________________
C56K3391
Two-Tone
05/16
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Copyright 2010 Mark II Forum All Rights Reserved.